PEOPLE have accepted that our system of national Government, the gravy train, is being driven by a small minority among us who get together and call themselves Labour or Tory.

And that, locally, an even smaller group calling themselves Lib Dems, are becoming station masters.

They operate together under an amalgamation we could call the PPs (political parties), and when we sack one lot, for a failing performance or skulduggery, the others take over.

Without membership, as mere voters, we are powerless, paying passengers travelling to unknown destinations.

Even accepting this lot as the only available route towards having our own way, and not being totally dominated by the rich and powerful, it would be a bit nearer the mark if the PPs were to share joint responsibility for decisions in Government, thereby being responsive to a much wider range of our opinions, needs and aspirations.

Tony Blair promised to hold a referendum about this, but chickened out for ten years.

As a mere voter, I would feel more involved, responsible and closer to the MP I voted for. There would be more reciprocation.

Our voters are increasingly opting out of pointless politics, as it is, and Wales and Scotland are getting out.

Why are media interviewers not hammering home this subject with politicians now?

Effective opposition and independent membership have been missing in Westminster for 20 years.

Does the media still yearn for its missing excitement rather than the prospect of consensus Government?

I cannot understand it.

George Appleby, Leighton Croft, Clifton, York.