POLICE in North Yorkshire have reacted with 'dismay and anger and frustration' after it emerged today that people will continue to be prioritised by age for Covid jabs in the next phase of the vaccination programme.
People aged 40-49 will be vaccinated next, with scientific advisers saying the move will “provide the greatest benefit in the shortest time”.
The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI)said it had considered whether groups such as teachers and police officers should be vaccinated next, but concluded the most effective way to prevent death and hospital admission is to carry on prioritising people by age.
It said modelling studies for phase 2 of the vaccination programme also indicated that the speed of vaccine deployment is the most important factor in helping prevent severe illness and death.
But Chief Inspector Rob Bowles, chair of the North Yorkshire Police Federation, said officers would react with 'dismay and anger and frustration' at the decision.
He said they were frontline workers, seeking to enforce Covid regulations, whose health was increasingly being put at risk by criminals coughing and spitting in their faces, and who should be prioritised like health and care workers.
His comments echoed those of Metropolitan Police Federation chairman Ken Marsh, who said: “It’s absolutely disgusting – they don’t give a damn about us."
The Press has asked the NEU teachers' union in North Yorkshire for comment.
Under the recommendations, in phase 2, priority will be given in the following order:
– All those aged 40-49
– All those aged 30-39
– All those aged 18-29
These groups will be vaccinated once all those in phase 1 (the over-50s and most vulnerable) have received a jab, with the Government having a set of target for them of mid-April.
Professor Wei Shen Lim, Covid-19 chair for the JCVI, told a briefing that age “remains a dominant factor – it is still one of the most important causes of severe disease, even in those aged 50 years and below”.
He said that even within different occupational groups, it is older people who are more at risk than those who are younger.
In a statement, he added: “Vaccinations stop people from dying and the current strategy is to prioritise those who are more likely to have severe outcomes and die from Covid-19.
“The evidence is clear that the risk of hospitalisation and death increases with age.
“The vaccination programme is a huge success and continuing the age-based rollout will provide the greatest benefit in the shortest time, including to those in occupations at a higher risk of exposure.”
A UK Government spokeswoman said the JCVI advice reflected the fact age remains “the strongest factor” linked to death and hospital admission and “the speed of delivery (of vaccines) is crucial.”
She added: “All four parts of the UK will follow the recommended approach, subject to the final advice given by the independent expert committee.
“The UK Government remains on course to meet its target to offer a vaccine to all those in the phase 1 priority groups by mid-April, and all adults by the end of July.”
The JCVI said that targeting occupational groups (such as teachers) would have been more complex to deliver and may slow down the vaccine programme, leaving some vulnerable people at higher risk for longer.
It also said that, operationally, simple and easy-to-deliver programmes are “critical for rapid deployment and high vaccine uptake”.
Dr Mary Ramsay, head of immunisations at Public Health England (PHE), said: “Delivering a vaccination programme on this scale is incredibly complex and the JCVI’s advice will help us continue protecting individuals from the risk of hospitalisation at pace.
“The age-based approach will ensure more people are protected more quickly.
“It is crucial that those at higher risk – including men and BAME (black, Asian and minority ethnic communities) communities – are encouraged to take the vaccine, and that local health systems are fully engaged and reaching out to under-served communities to ensure they can access the vaccine.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel