Plans to cover a swathe of high grade agricultural land in North Yorkshire with solar panels have sparked a wave of opposition, despite the firm behind the scheme radically reducing the size of the venture.
The last week has seen more than 100 objections lodged to Harmony Energy’s planned solar farm beside the former Second World War prisoner-of-war site at Eden Camp, Old Malton, with some branding the potential loss of best and most versatile graded farmland as “ludicrous” and even “monstrous”.
The objections come just weeks after the firm submitted an array of documents to Ryedale District Council to justify its proposal, which has been cut from covering 130 hectares to almost 53 hectares.
Harmony Energy says the panels would generate sufficient green energy to power 8,660 homes.
The objections also come ahead of an event being staged by Harmony Energy, from 3pm to 7pm on Monday (February 20) at The Talbot Malton Hotel, Yorkersgate, to highlight revisions to the scheme.
The firm says the 30.4MW scheme, on land owned by the Fitzwilliam Trust Corporation, would bring about substantial environmental, social and economic benefits, including carbon dioxide savings amounting to just over 12,500 tonnes a year and supply the average annual electricity needs for 38 per cent of households in Ryedale district.
Alongside proposed ecological enhancements, which the firm claims would result in a biodiversity net gain of 105 per cent, the firm has highlighted that just 56 per cent of the proposed site is graded best and most versatile (BMV) farmland.
.The application states the proposed development cannot be located elsewhere as for large-scale solar farms to connect to the national grid, there must be a technically and financially viable connection available, with grid capacity with Northern Powergrid having been secured and a nearby substation being the only suitable local one.
The proposal follows councils elsewhere in North Yorkshire, such as Richmondshire, being roundly condemned by some for giving consent to solar farms on top quality farmland, amid fears energy insecurity was being substituted for food insecurity.
Despite the revised proposal, objectors have voiced fury over “using wildlife rich and productive farmland to install solar panels”, saying there is an abundance of brownfield sites and roofs of buildings where solar panels could be installed.
One objector stated: “British farming needs supporting and to allow solar panels be installed on good quality land that is used for food production is ludicrous.”
In an objection, Richard Gueterbock, a former Government adviser, who edited the 2022 Royal Agriculture Society of England Farm of the Future Report, said given the current concerns about food and energy security, the country “cannot afford to remove more productive farmland away from arable production”.
Another objector, Jan Thornton, a York and North Yorkshire Local Enterprise Partnership Board member and vice chair of Grow Yorkshire, added it would inappropriate if “productive farmland should be surrendered to energy use in
this case”.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel