Yorkshire Water has appeared in court over allegations of under-reporting pollution incidents and over-charging customers as a result.
It appeared alongside four other UK water companies – Severn Trent Water, United Utilities Water, Northumbrian Water and Anglian Water – who are alleged to have failed to reveal the true scale of sewage discharges and spills made into UK waterways.
They also are alleged to have breached competition law because any under-reporting could have affected the price they could charge customers.
The claims are being brought by Professor Carolyn Roberts, a water resource management specialist, on behalf of an estimated 20 million affected customers.
Law firm Leigh Day, which is representing Prof Roberts, said households could receive a share of up to £800 million in compensation if successful.
Legal representatives for the five firms appeared at the Competition Appeal Tribunal in London for a preliminary hearing in London on Tuesday (March 19).
Prof Roberts and the respondents already agreed the claims against all five firms should be heard together.
Industry regulator Ofwat, which is currently carrying out its own investigations into regulatory breaches, also attended the hearing on Tuesday amid questions over how the claims being brought by Prof Roberts might relate or interact with its own probes.
Mr Justice Marcus Smith set the date for a hearing to decide whether the claims are suitable to proceed as opt-out collective claims – where all affected customers are included in the claim unless they request to be removed – and approve Prof Roberts as the class representative.
This “certification” hearing will take place over a week from September 23.
But Mr Justice Marcus Smith also set the date for a second hearing from January 13 2025, which can cover any additional issues due to the complex questions around Ofwat’s own investigations and powers under the Competition Act.
The judge said: “The process is clearly not going to be as straightforward as the usual certification process.”
He later added: “We may not neatly resolve everything in the week allocated as ‘week one’. We very much anticipate and hope to do so but these are knotty issues and we are at an early stage, so we want to have that adverse contingency covered off.”
If certified, the claims can proceed to a full trial, which Leigh Day estimates will take at least two to three years.
The case comes as the UK’s first environmental collective actions.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article