I HAVE always considered "parliamentary democracy" to be a contradiction in terms, so I am pleased so many of my fellow citizens decided to boycott the general election.

Those who accept the validity of our "sneak past the post" system must accept the non-voters have won, and truly represent the voice of the people.

Until recently and, and despite my misgivings, I would swallow my distaste and vote in all elections. I was one of those few who dutifully took part in national "consultations", when I thought I could make a useful contribution.

That was before my "Damascus moment", when I realised voting in national elections was like joining the Nazi Party to get rid of Hitler.

Of course, I worry about the economy, but comfort myself with the reflection that a successful Chancellor is one who listens to good advice, and is fortunate enough to live in prosperous times. I worry more about the constitution. I am horrified that habeas corpus and the jury system are in danger.

I am angry that so much power is delegated to unrepresentative bodies, that the Upper House is to become as assembly of governmental placemen, and that prime ministers can tell us when, how and where to vote, and then change all in a moment to suit themselves, with never a care for referendums or public opinion.

When will these things be an election issue, I wonder? Show me a politician passionate about justice, integrity, and above all democracy, and I'll be first at the polling booth, if any still remain.

William Dixon Smith,

Welland Rise,

Acomb,

York.

Updated: 10:56 Friday, May 20, 2005