AGRICULTURE minister Ben Bradshaw's unusual, but welcome, U-turn on open general licences for shooting pigeons and crows obscures a more worrying approach by this Government towards shooting. In their 2001 manifesto Labour promised it had "no intention whatsoever of placing restrictions on the sports of angling and shooting".
Yet the truth is that indirectly, but steadily, shooting has been interfered with. Had it not been for the intervention of rural groups the damage may have been even more substantial.
The draft Animal Welfare Bill contains a number of proposed and unnecessary measures that would impact heavily on the rearing of game, and thus the viability of most British game shooting and associated industries.
The Home Office firearms review hints at restrictions on the age young people can use weapons and the number of guns an individual may own.
The Hunting Act, not the Government's finest piece of work, contains restrictions in the way a gamekeeper can use a dog to control pests. The Government said it would allow hunting to continue under licence, but could not control its own party, the result being a ban of sorts.
We know a significant number of backbenchers hate shooting just as much as hunting and for much the same reason - the sight of a tweed coat provokes much the same old prejudices as the sight of a red one.
John Haigh,
Countryside Alliance regional director,
Northallerton Road,
Thirsk.
Updated: 09:33 Wednesday, March 16, 2005
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article