In his letter about rules preventing councillors discussing planning matters on which they may later take decisions ('Stifling new rule', March 9), Mr Smith repeats a common misconception about old buildings which are not listed.

He referred to Haxby Memorial Hall which, he says, has had a large sum of money committed towards its demolition and replacement by a new building.

I should like to correct the misapprehension inherent in Mr Smith's statement.

Before a decision to demolish the Memorial Hall could be taken, a number of things would have to happen. The Hall is old and unlisted but it is situated in the Haxby conservation area where its location gives it a measure of protection.

It is made quite clear in Government planning guidance on the historic environment that there is a presumption in favour of keeping unlisted buildings in conservation areas where they make a positive contribution. Before conservation area consent is given for Haxby Memorial Hall to be knocked down a case must made demonstrating it does not contribute to the character or appearance of the area. Because it was built as the village school in 1876 in a handsome architectural style typical of its time, and because it continued this function until 1954, there can be no question that it is an integral part of the character of Haxby.

Added to which, it is identified by the council itself as an "individually important building".

Lastly, it was nominated in the Evening Press for inclusion on the list of buildings of local interest and importance because it is a memorial to those lost in two world wars.

Given all this, it is difficult to see how an argument could be made against the hall contributing to the character and appearance of the Haxby conservation area.

Alison Sinclair,

Chair,

Conservation Areas Advisory Panel,

Norfolk Street,

Bishopthorpe Road, York.

Updated: 10:23 Tuesday, March 15, 2005