STEPHEN Higson, a former soldier who was attacked by drunken yobs in York city centre, today hit out at plans to introduce 24-hour drinking.

Understandably, given his recent ordeal, he believes that Britain's attitude to alcohol is not mature enough to cope with this reform.

His comments can be added to a growing chorus of concern about the change. Senior police officers, including those in North Yorkshire, have voiced serious worries about how the extended hours could stretch their resources to breaking point.

Health specialists fear late night drinking will worsen Britain's binge culture.

Yet the principle behind the Act remains sound. Our 11 o'clock drinking curfew is antiquated and overdue for reform. We need to end the nightmare of last orders, where pub-goers speed-drink to beat the deadline before being thrown out on to the streets all at the same time.

It is madness that a theatre or concert-goer cannot enjoy a pint or a glass of wine after their evening's entertainment. It is baffling for foreign tourists to see York shut down before midnight.

However, the new law must be applied with the greatest care. Councils should only grant extended licences to premises with an excellent record for good behaviour. Waiter service could be a licence condition.

Meanwhile, funds must be made available to cover the extra cost for policing. A levy on the drinks industry would be the most appropriate way to raise the revenue.

Updated: 11:49 Friday, January 14, 2005