I AM probably in favour of goal-line technology at the highest level - Premiership, European games and World Cup.

But that means that the vast majority of games played (99 per cent) would be without the technology, and most of these at local level with only one neutral referee.

Although such technology can determine if the ball has "wholly" crossed the goal-line (between the goalpost and under the crossbar), this technology would have to reflect the current Law Ten. The ball does have to go a long way over the line to fulfil this criteria. As an example, seen side on, you must be able to see the whole ball past the goalpost.

The technology would also have to be faultless or foolproof. This "goal judge" technology could be seen as the thin end of the wedge.

I feel that using technology for offsides, penalties, etc. would be unrealistic. It would slow the game down and it would lose its impact in terms of the way the game is played at present.

Technology is used in tennis to determine line calls but this has proved controversial and players still argue with the umpire.

In rugby league, referees don't always make try-scoring decisions but rely on video evidence. This slows the game down dramatically and often undermines the referee's responsibilities.

In cricket we have, by nature, a slow game. Video technology is useful for run outs and stumpings. But is inconclusive for lbw decisions.

Controversy is still rife in these sports.

If technology was implemented I would imagine that there would still be much controversy.

Referees do make errors but, fortunately, not as many as the players. Major decisions at the highest level are often proven correct by video replay.

Decision-making is at the heart of the game of football.

Refereeing is a challenging task, hindered by players who constantly stretch the laws to the limit and disregard the spirit of fair play.

As an active referee I believe that it is inevitable for some goal-line technology at the highest level, but for most of us it will be the usual thrust of local football for players who enjoy the game, without the pressure of money and TV.

I am sure that if you asked most players, they would disagree with intervention in order to preserve the game as exciting as it is at present.

David King,

FA Licensed Instructor,

Beechwood Glade,

York.

Updated: 11:07 Saturday, January 08, 2005