ONE hundred and seventy spaces to go here, 120 to go there... York's parking capacity is being reduced chunk by chunk.

But is this a systematic programme, part of a rigorously researched and timed strategy? Or is it an ad hoc response to the demands of unrelated developments?

Few would argue with City of York Council's stated aim of reducing traffic growth. Chopping away at the numbers of parking bays could cause more problems than it solves, however.

The council is confident that York can absorb the cuts. Motorists will query what that confidence is based on.

There does not appear to be a definitive figure, based on detailed examination of demand, for the number of car parking spaces York city centre ought to provide.

Instead spaces are going here, there and everywhere. The council is relying on the electronic messaging system, which directs motorists to spare bays, and Park and Ride to avoid gridlock.

Whether there will be any spare bays at peak times remains to be seen. And laudable though Park and Ride is, it is not suitable for everyone. The convenience shopper, the shopper buying bulky goods and the shopper with a young family will always depend on the car.

There is a fear that without a more co-ordinated traffic strategy, York people will vote with their wheels and choose the convenience of Clifton Moor and Monks Cross. Those who travel here from the West Riding and beyond may skip York altogether for Leeds.

Residents' anger at the council's increased parking charges was made clear today when we handed over scores of readers' complaints to Ann Reid.

Combine this unpopular decision with the car park cuts and we can be sure that the council is anti-parking.

But where is its viable alternative?

Updated: 10:06 Friday, March 26, 2004