CONTROVERSIAL plans to expand the University of York must be given the go-ahead if the institution is to maintain its place at the top, influential research claims.
A report looking at a future vision of York reveals the university must be allowed to secure land at Heslington east if it is to keep its place as one of Britain's top ten universities.
The report, A New Vision For York, commissioned by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, states: "The University of York...represents a fantastic asset for the city, with the potential to become the major growth engine for the local economy.
"The city needs to ensure it delivers the proposed Heslington east land for the University to expand in physical terms in order to retain its top ten position".
Professor Brian Cantor, the university's Vice-Chancellor, said City of York Council was shortly to consider a draft development brief outlining the university's proposals before further public consultation.
But Jeff Stern, an opponent of the expansion, said: "No-one in the village is against the university expansion as such.
"What we want is to make sure that the alternatives are explored. It hasn't been thought through properly and is camouflage architecture. We feel it is being sneaked into the environment."
Prof Canter said: "Many believe that the expansion of the University is absolutely vital to the city's economic future.
"It will also bring huge benefits to the community in new arts and sports developments, new educational opportunities, and new links with local groups and businesses.
"We want it to be environmentally-friendly, visually beautiful and a place of great opportunity. We have a world-class university which wants to do its home city proud."
Alasdair Morrison, the council's development chief, said: "We will continue to work with the university and partners to develop a master plan which will meet both the campus requirements and those of the city."
For a special report on the influential A New Vision for York report, see Tuesday's Evening Press.
Updated: 10:08 Saturday, May 31, 2003
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article