COLIN Burrows has a very good point when he expresses his dismay at the subtle 'pressure' created by the methods used by York Minster to collect 'donations' (Minster 'bullies', Evening Press, September 21).

The point that resonates most with me is his question "are only affluent people entitled to see this house of God?".

Honesty should be the cornerstone of any religion. Suggesting specific donation amounts is pure extortion under the guise of it being voluntary, and it can also be potentially offensive to those of lesser means.

York Minster is an astounding structure. It is also a place of worship.

The commercial drive that arises from a need for funds to maintain it must be kept in balance with its nobler purposes, perhaps to touch the spirit and provide solace?

In my view, either the Minster's administration should resort to a set fee for everyone or there should be discreetly placed donation collection points and the suggested donation signs removed at once. A 'thermometer' showing the required maintenance funds and the present 'temperature' of funds collected might help too.

Alternatively, the operation could be funded through local taxation. I do not think most people object to helping to support the Minster, what they object to is the emotionally strong-armed approach presently employed.

The bottom line is that no one can make you feel guilty, all they can do is try. The ultimate responsibility is with us to be strong enough to know a scam when we see one, to chuckle and walk right by, thereby maintaining personal power.

Jim Rivis,

Montpelier,

Vermont, USA.

Updated: 10:34 Tuesday, September 24, 2002