YORKSHIRE managed to avoid a record innings defeat at Headingley yesterday but still received a tongue lashing from new captain Darren Lehmann after capitulating to Surrey by an innings and 168 runs.
"There is a lot of work for us to do because this was a very poor performance all round," said the Australian.
"The bowling was not good, although it improved on the second day, but our batting was even worse. In the first innings we showed no initiative in trying to play the sort of positive cricket which we want to do and in the second our top-order batsmen went too much the other way.
"Fortunately, we now have a run of one-day cricket coming up which is a good thing because we can go out and play our shots."
Chris Taylor hit a maiden 50 and with able assistance from the later batsmen took the final score to 202 which was still the sixth heaviest innings loss in the club's history.
SCOREBOARD
Frizzell County Championship
Division One
Yorkshire v Surrey
at Headingley
Yorkshire first innings: 140 (A J Tudor 4-31)
Surrey first innings: 510 (Stewart 96, Kirby 5-129)
Yorkshire Second Innings
Wood c Stewart b Bicknell 0
Richardson b Tudor 0
Sidebottom not out 14
Lumb c Bicknell b Tudor 15
Lehmann c&b Bicknell 1
Taylor not out 52
Fellows lbw b Ormond 24
Hamilton lbw b Azhar M 7
Blakey c A Brown b Ormond 31
Silverwood b Azhar Mahmood 38
Kirby lbw Azhar Mahmood 2
Extras lb4 nb6 18
Total (57.3 overs) 202
Fall: 1-0 2-0 3-20 4-28 5-32 6-67 7-80 8-129 9-188
Bowling: Bicknell 14-4-43-3, Tudor 15-3-72-2, Ormond 11.2-50-2, Azhar Mahmood 13.3-5-18-3, Butcher 4-0-21-0
Umpires: G I Burgess and I J Gould
Surrey (20pts) beat Yorkshire (3pts) by an innings ands 168 runs
Updated: 11:04 Saturday, April 27, 2002
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article