A UNIVERSITY of York academic today called for a wide-ranging debate on
whether taxes should rise to pay for greater spending in the war on child
poverty.
Prof Jonathan Bradshaw said the Government's policies had helped to lift
about £1 million youngsters out of poverty over the past three years.
But he has teamed up with seven other leading academics to warn a further
three million children's lives are being "diminished by poverty each day".
In an open letter they state: "The success of the anti-poverty strategy - as the government is starting to acknowledge - will ultimately depend on carrying the country with it.
"This requires three things. First, "doing good by stealth" needs to give
way to a higher profile, unequivocal, anti-poverty commitment across
government.
"Second, the anti-poverty policy must be integrated into, and presented as
part of, a broader strategy to create a fairer society.
"This will involve, for instance, linking the government's means-tested
child poverty policies to further real increases in child benefit to invest
in all our children - and all our futures.
"It will also mean extending the current debate about raising taxes to
include financing improvements in benefits as well as services, together
with the distributional implications of various tax-raising options.
"The forthcoming Budget, seen as setting the course for the second-term
Labour government, will be an important test of its continued resolve to
tackle child poverty.
"We call on the chancellor to use it to announce a further investment of
resources in the nation's children and to signal a wider debate on how to
build a fairer society, involving all sections of the population."
The other academics to have signed the letter are: Prof Ruth Lister, of Loughborough University; Fran Bennett
and Prof AB Atkinson, of University of Oxford;
Sue Middleton, of Loughborough University; Prof Jane Millar, of University
of Bath; Prof David Piachaud, of London School of Economics and Holly
Sutherland of University of Cambridge.
Updated: 09:04 Monday, March 25, 2002
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article