York's "get tough" policy on nightmare neighbours has suffered a setback after the city council lost its highest profile case.
Bernadette Teasdale, who six weeks ago was ordered by a judge to leave her home in Lucas Avenue, Clifton, because of anti-social behaviour, has been given a second chance.
The defiant tenant, who says she has now opted for a council house exchange to diffuse tension in the area, said: "I am not a neighbour from hell - and the court agrees with me."
But other residents now say the City of York Council's tough stance on nuisance neighbours lies in tatters.
Ms Teasdale was given a month to leave her home after her former next-door neighbour Alison Merritt and Mrs Merritt's family complained of noise, damage and abuse, and said they had eventually had to move because they could not endure the problems any longer.
Ms Teasdale appealed to York County Court against the eviction order - and the court has given her another chance provided she agrees to abide by certain conditions.
"I gave my word that my ex-boyfriend could not come back to the house, " she said.
"I feel marvellous about the decision. I lost a lot of weight worrying about it.
"I've now decided the best thing is to move and I've been to look at houses in The Groves and Spalding Avenue areas," she said.
She said seven of her neighbours had signed a petition which she presented in court to say they had never had any trouble with her family.
A neighbour and friend of Mrs Merritt, who did not want to be named, said: "I think the whole thing stinks, I really do. Alison was worn down over many months and lived in fear.
"It does not do the council any favours either. They came out all big and tough saying they were going to sort it out, then the exact opposite happens."
Mrs Merritt and her familyhave gone on holiday.
Council leader Rod Hills said: "Residents can hardly blame us if the court decides in a certain way. But it shows we are determined to take action against people who are 'neighbours from hell'."
Council spokeswoman Julie Thirwell said the court's decision made it clear the onus was now on Ms Teasdale to behave herself.
See COMMENT Council's stance must remain firm
Converted for the new archive on 30 June 2000. Some images and formatting may have been lost in the conversion.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article