PHILIP Robinson complained about the transport infrastructure improvements being planned for York, under the 2006-10 Local Transport Plan (Letters, July 19).

Readers may be unaware that Whitehall actually makes the rules on what kind of improvements will qualify for LTP funding.

Local authorities who submit proposals which reduce car dependency, and encourage transfer to other travel modes, are likely to receive full funding. Any proposals which pander to car owners, will fall by the wayside.

Like Mr Robinson, I do not foresee the need for cycle lanes along the full length of the A1237. The close presence of noise and fumes, and lack of segregated crossings with radial roads, would be very unattractive to urban cyclists such as myself. Useful short lengths, across the Ouse Bridge, for example, would be of benefit.

More important is to get non-motorised travellers safely across the ring road, with more segregated crossings such as Rawcliffe's cycle and pedestrian subway. These would encourage walking and cycling between York's urban and parish areas.

One can understand the frustration of those who believe buying a car also buys them the right to hassle-free travel to and from York.

This perceived "right to drive" brought vociferous objections to bus priority proposals along the A19 corridor, on the grounds that "buses delay traffic".

This has greatly reduced the ability of Park & Ride to offer a competitive alternative to the car.

However, technology is being introduced which will enable buses and taxis to identify themselves at the approach to traffic lights, and get the green light quicker.

How long before car drivers cotton on to the idea of tailgating buses?

Paul Hepworth,

Windmill Rise, York.

Updated: 10:41 Friday, July 22, 2005