YOU invite readers' views on the pros and cons of closing the footpath through St Peter's School grounds (April 14).

Ever since this dispute began, I have been mystified as to why so many people are against the closure (or have I been fooled by the loudness of their protests?). Why cannot those who now use the path go instead via The Avenue on one side of the school or Queen Anne's Road on the other? Surely it's as broad as it's long.

I am as keen as anyone to preserve historic customs when reasonably possible, but to maintain that public rights of way are set in stone regardless of changed conditions seems a very weak argument.

To be responsible for the safety of hundreds of young people, not to mention the protection of property, is a formidable burden.

Opponents of the closure say that not much crime has been committed by intruders up to now. Who can blame the school authorities for trying to prevent crime instead of sitting waiting for it to happen? If it does happen, let no one be wise after the event.

Joyce McDougald,

North Parade, York.

Updated: 09:51 Monday, April 24, 2006