We’ve been had – by some party-political shenanigans of the worst kind. Talk about grubby debates.
Alleging that cutting the number of rubbish bins is an alternative to reducing expenditure on the needy is frankly cynical opportunism.
How can our councillors talk about the two issues in the same breath – let alone couple them together as competing service priorities?
Aware that dirty politics abounds in the murky corridors of council offices we know the depths have really been plumbed when rubbish like this is dredged up.
Let me spell it out for the doubters.
An absence of bins will result in an increase in litter.
Extra litter will result in the need for more staff (or overtime payments).
Additional staff equates to more money to be shelled out, but meanwhile the budget has been spent on other things. Ergo a reduction in litter bins increases overall costs to the council taxpayer.
Allan Charlesworth, Old Earswick, York
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here